Citation

Pfattheicher S, Keller J, Knezević G. Person. Soc. Psychol. Bull. 2017; 43(3): 337-346.

Affiliation

2 University of Belgrade, Serbia.

Copyright

(Copyright © 2017, SAGE Publishing)

DOI

10.1177/0146167216684134

PMID

28903691

Abstract

In public goods situations, a specific destructive behavior emerges when individuals face the possibility of punishing others: antisocial punishment, that is, costly punishing cooperative individuals. So far, little is known about the (intuitive or reflective) processes underlying antisocial punishment. Building on the Social Heuristics Hypothesis and arguing that antisocial punishment reflects the basic characteristics of sadism, namely, aggressive behavior to dominate and to harm other individuals it is assumed that everyday sadists intuitively engage in antisocial punishment. Two studies document that activating (Study 1) and inhibiting (Study 2) the intuitive system when a punishment option can be realized in one-shot iterated public goods games increased (Study 1) and reduced (Study 2) antisocial punishment, in particular among individuals who reported a proneness to sadism. In sum, the present research suggests that sadistic tendencies executed intuitively play a crucial role regarding antisocial punishment in public goods situations.

Language: en

Keywords

antisocial punishment; intuition; punishment; sadism; social dilemma