Citation

Fawcett RJ, Kernohan G. Emerg. Med. J. 2018; 35(10): 587-589.

Affiliation

Institute of Nursing and Health Research, University of Ulster, Coleraine, UK.

Copyright

(Copyright © 2018, BMJ Publishing Group)

DOI

10.1136/emermed-2017-206649

PMID

28899923

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To discover if healthcare professionals working within an ED are able to make a diagnosis of female genital mutilation (FGM) in those patients who have previously undergone the procedure and report it as per UK law.

DESIGN: A retrospective analysis of patients' notes who were assigned an FGM code during the period of May 2015 to August 2016. SETTING: Single-centre, large UK major trauma centre offering a tertiary FGM clinic. PARTICIPANTS: Any woman coded during the study period as having undergone FGM. PRIMARY OUTCOME: Number of FGM cases identified by the ED. SECONDARY OUTCOMES: Mean age, presenting complaint, discharge diagnosis, genitourinary exam and defibulation status.

RESULTS: 34 patients were identified as having undergone FGM, 19 had previously attended ED and none had their FGM identified during their ED attendance. The age range of those identified was 23 to 40 years. None had undergone defibulation.

CONCLUSION: This study demonstrates that the identification of FGM victims by an ED is very poor, and more work needs to be done to increase awareness of the subject by front-line staff.

© Article author(s) (or their employer(s) unless otherwise stated in the text of the article) 2017. All rights reserved. No commercial use is permitted unless otherwise expressly granted.

Language: en

Keywords

Uro-genital; emergency department management; guidelines; law; violence, non-accidental