Citation

Gerard FJ, Crookes RL, Elliott S, Hellenbach M, Stamos A, Poole H, Bowen E. Sci. Justice 2017; 57(5): 384-393.

Affiliation

Centre for Research in Psychology, Behaviour and Achievement, Coventry University, Priory Street, Coventry CV1 5FB, United Kingdom. Electronic address: E.Bowen@worc.ac.uk.

Copyright

(Copyright © 2017, Forensic Science Society, Publisher Elsevier Publishing)

DOI

10.1016/j.scijus.2017.04.010

PMID

28889869

Abstract

The current study explored the use of ballistic examinations and cross-border information sharing across 14 European countries. The presented data were collected using a mixed methods technique consisting of semi-structured interviews and questionnaires that were completed by participants. The results painted a very heterogeneous picture of the use of automated ballistic systems across these countries, as well as how ballistic analyses are integrated in the fight against gun-enabled crime. Three super-ordinates themes emerged from the thematic analysis: use of automated ballistic systems; Ballistic evidence recovery and analysis; knowledge exchange and best practices. The ability to draw firm conclusions regarding the value of ballistics comparison systems, either on a national or cross-border basis, is hampered by inconsistencies regarding data recording practices and definitions. Therefore, key recommendations are suggested to establish better cross border cooperation between member states and develop a better understanding of data sharing procedures.

Copyright © 2017 The Chartered Society of Forensic Sciences. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Language: en

Keywords

Ballistic evidence sharing; Cross-border comparison; European ballistic database; Firearm; Open case file