SAFETYLIT WEEKLY UPDATE

We compile citations and summaries of about 400 new articles every week.
RSS Feed

HELP: Tutorials | FAQ
CONTACT US: Contact info

Search Results

Journal Article

Citation

Fiorelli CM, Polastri PF, Rodrigues ST, Baptista AM, Penedo T, Pereira VAI, Simieli L, Barbieri FA. Neurosci. Lett. 2017; 660: 130-134.

Affiliation

São Paulo State University (Unesp), School of Sciences, Laboratory of Information, Vision and Action (LIVIA), Department of Physical Education, Bauru, SP, Brazil; SãoPaulo State University (Unesp), School of Sciences, Human Movement Research Laboratory, Department of Physical Education, Faculty of Sciences, Bauru, SP, Brazil. Electronic address: barbieri@fc.unesp.br.

Copyright

(Copyright © 2017, Elsevier Publishing)

DOI

10.1016/j.neulet.2017.09.008

PMID

28889009

Abstract

Postural control is influenced by eye movements. Gaze fixation, which comprises a component of ocular vergence, is important in the acquisition of highly specific task information, but its relation to postural control is little investigated. The aim of the study was to investigate the effects of gaze fixation position(central and lateral fixations) on postural sway in young adults. Forty young adults with ages ranging from 20 to 35 years were invited to participate in the study. Postural sway was measured in quiet stance in bipedal support in three 60-s trials under the following conditions: gaze fixation on a target positioned in front of participant, gaze fixation on a target positioned on right side of participant, and gaze fixation on a target positioned on left side of participant. The following center of pressure parameters (COP) in the anteroposterior (AP) and mediolateral directions (ML) were analyzed for each of the trials: body sway displacement, mean velocity of sway, root mean square (RMS) of sway, and median frequency. In addition, detrended fluctuation analysis (DFA) exponent, in anteroposterior and medio-lateral directions, was calculated. The COP presented greater AP and ML displacement (p<0.03, effect size=1.37; and p<0.03, effect size=1.64, respectively) and RMS AP and ML (p<0.04, effect size=1.66; and p<0.02, effect size=2.50, respectively) for lateral gaze fixation compared to central gaze fixation. These results suggest that gaze fixation on a laterally positioned target increases body sway in anteroposterior and mediolateral directions.

Copyright © 2017. Published by Elsevier B.V.


Language: en

Keywords

Eye fixation; Eye movements; Gaze position; Motor control; Postural control; Quiet stance

NEW SEARCH


All SafetyLit records are available for automatic download to Zotero & Mendeley
Print