Citation

Bell R, Röer JP, Marsh JE, Storch D, Buchner A. Exp. Psychol. 2017; 64(5): 359-368.

Affiliation

1 Department of Experimental Psychology, Heinrich Heine University Düsseldorf, Germany.

Copyright

(Copyright © 2017, Hogrefe Publishing)

DOI

10.1027/1618-3169/a000372

PMID

28662612

Abstract

Deviant as well as changing auditory distractors interfere with short-term memory. According to the duplex model of auditory distraction, the deviation effect is caused by a shift of attention while the changing-state effect is due to obligatory order processing. This theory predicts that foreknowledge should reduce the deviation effect, but should have no effect on the changing-state effect. We compared the effect of foreknowledge on the two phenomena directly within the same experiment. In a pilot study, specific foreknowledge was impotent in reducing either the changing-state effect or the deviation effect, but it reduced disruption by sentential speech, suggesting that the effects of foreknowledge on auditory distraction may increase with the complexity of the stimulus material. Given the unexpected nature of this finding, we tested whether the same finding would be obtained in (a) a direct preregistered replication in Germany and (b) an additional replication with translated stimulus materials in Sweden.

Language: en

Keywords

attentional capture; cross-modal distraction; interference control; top-down control; working memory