Citation

Siddharth BR, Keerthi MSS, Naidu SB, Venkanna M. Indian J. Surg. 2017; 79(3): 196-200.

Affiliation

Mahatma Gandhi Memorial Hospital, Kakatiya Medical College, Warangal, Telangana India.

Copyright

(Copyright © 2017, Springer India)

DOI

10.1007/s12262-016-1459-0

PMID

28659671

PMCID

PMC5473790

Abstract

Penetrating abdominal trauma forms an important component of surgical emergencies, most of the victims being young aged in the prime of their life. Over the past century, the diagnosis and management of this common problem has seen drastic changes, finally reaching the destination of selective approach. We present our experience in the management of this group of patients in the rural setup. This is a prospective observational study done at our hospital between 1 April 2013 and 31 March 2015 including patients who presented with penetrating abdominal injury. The clinical presentation, imaging features, diagnosis, management, and complications of all these patients are analyzed. The mean age was 33.5 years with majority being males. Homicidal stab injuries accounted for most of the injuries (62.5 %). Forty-eight patients underwent laparotomy, and among which, the procedure was therapeutic in 36 patients. Peritoneal penetration was the best predictor of a therapeutic laparotomy with a high sensitivity and positive predictive value (100 and 80 %, respectively). The small intestine was the most commonly injured organ. The mean postoperative stay was 8.25 days, and there was no mortality. Though the management of these patients should aim at minimizing the rate of negative laparotomies, this should not be done at the expense of delayed diagnosis and treatment. Diagnostic laparoscopy may avoid unnecessary laparotomies; however, it requires adequate skills in laparoendoscopy. Management is best tailor made for each individual based on the nature of injury, findings at presentation, and the organ injured.

Language: en

Keywords

Abdominal injury; Bowel perforation; Bull gore injury; Penetrating injury