SAFETYLIT WEEKLY UPDATE

We compile citations and summaries of about 400 new articles every week.
RSS Feed

HELP: Tutorials | FAQ
CONTACT US: Contact info

Search Results

Journal Article

Citation

Tremoleda JL, Watts SA, Reynolds PS, Thiemermann C, Brohi K. Shock 2017; 48(6): 610-623.

Affiliation

*Centre for Trauma Sciences, Queen Mary University of London, Blizard Institute, Barts and The London School of Medicine & Dentistry, London, UK †CBR Division, Defence Science and Technology Laboratory, Defence Science and Technology Laboratory, Porton Down, Salisbury, UK ‡Department of Anesthesiology, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida, USA §Centre for Translational Medicine and Therapeutics, Queen Mary University of London, William Harvey Research Institute, Barts and The London School of Medicine & Dentistry, London, UK.

Copyright

(Copyright © 2017, The Shock Society, Publisher Lippincott Williams and Wilkins)

DOI

10.1097/SHK.0000000000000901

PMID

28509685

Abstract

Trauma is responsible for a large proportion of the world's burden of disease, and is by far the biggest killer of young adults. Haemorrhage is the leading cause of preventable death and its effects are directly correlated with the incidence multi-organ failure in survivors. Trauma research is challenging due to patient heterogeneity, limited randomised controlled trials, and in vitro studies that fail to mimic the systemic injury response. Preclinical research remains essential for mechanistic and therapeutic discovery. Yet modelling the multi-faceted nature of traumatic injury poses important experimental and welfare challenges associated with the onset of injury and prehospital and intra-operative care, the limited inter-species validation of coagulation profiles, the use of anaesthesia/analgesia, and its impact on the systemic response to trauma; and the challenge of sustaining intensive care in recovery models. Proper model selection depends on the purpose of a given model and the criteria by which the experimental readouts will be clinically relevant. Such complexity warrants further refinement of experimental methodology and outcome measures to improve its clinical efficacy, while ensuring animal well-being. We review the experimental methodologies currently used for modelling traumatic haemorrhagic shock (THS) and addressing their impact on clinical translation. The aim of the review is to improve transparency and form a consensus when reporting methodology in trauma modelling.


Language: en

NEW SEARCH


All SafetyLit records are available for automatic download to Zotero & Mendeley
Print