SAFETYLIT WEEKLY UPDATE

We compile citations and summaries of about 400 new articles every week.
RSS Feed

HELP: Tutorials | FAQ
CONTACT US: Contact info

Search Results

Journal Article

Citation

Wittenberg E, Thompson J, Nam CS, Franz JR. Front. Hum. Neurosci. 2017; 11: e170.

Affiliation

Joint Department of Biomedical Engineering, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill and North Carolina State UniversityChapel Hill, NC, USA.

Copyright

(Copyright © 2017, Frontiers Research Foundation)

DOI

10.3389/fnhum.2017.00170

PMID

28443007

PMCID

PMC5385364

Abstract

This review examined 83 articles using neuroimaging modalities to investigate the neural correlates underlying static and dynamic human balance control, with aims to support future mobile neuroimaging research in the balance control domain. Furthermore, this review analyzed the mobility of the neuroimaging hardware and research paradigms as well as the analytical methodology to identify and remove movement artifact in the acquired brain signal. We found that the majority of static balance control tasks utilized mechanical perturbations to invoke feet-in-place responses (27 out of 38 studies), while cognitive dual-task conditions were commonly used to challenge balance in dynamic balance control tasks (20 out of 32 studies). While frequency analysis and event related potential characteristics supported enhanced brain activation during static balance control, that in dynamic balance control studies was supported by spatial and frequency analysis. Twenty-three of the 50 studies utilizing EEG utilized independent component analysis to remove movement artifacts from the acquired brain signals. Lastly, only eight studies used truly mobile neuroimaging hardware systems. This review provides evidence to support an increase in brain activation in balance control tasks, regardless of mechanical, cognitive, or sensory challenges. Furthermore, the current body of literature demonstrates the use of advanced signal processing methodologies to analyze brain activity during movement. However, the static nature of neuroimaging hardware and conventional balance control paradigms prevent full mobility and limit our knowledge of neural mechanisms underlying balance control.


Language: en

Keywords

mechanical perturbation; movement artifacts; sensory degradation; static and dynamic balance control; susceptibility to cognitive dual tasks; temporal and spatial dynamics of brain activation

NEW SEARCH


All SafetyLit records are available for automatic download to Zotero & Mendeley
Print