|
Abstract
|
OBJECTIVE: The primary objective of this study was to evaluate the effects of different speed control measures on the safety of unsignalized mid-block street crossings.
METHODS: In China, it is quite difficult to obtain traffic crash and conflict data for pedestrians using such crossings, mainly due to the lack of traffic data management and organizational issues. In light of this, the proposed method did not rely on such data, but considered vehicle speed, which is a leading contributing factor of pedestrian safety at mid-blocks. To evaluate the speed reduction effects at different locations, the research team utilized the following methods in this study: 1) testing speed differences: on the basis of the collected data, statistical analysis is conducted to test the speed differences between upstream and crosswalk, upstream and downstream, and downstream and crosswalk; and 2) mean distribution deviation: this value is calculated by taking the difference in cumulative speed distributions for the two different samples mentioned above. In order to better understand the variation of speed reduction effects at different distances from speed control facilities, data were collected from six types of speed control measures with a visual range of 60 meters.
RESULTS: The results showed that speed humps, transverse rumble strips, and speed bumps were effective in reducing vehicle speeds. Among them speed humps performed the best, with reductions of 21.1% and 20.0% from upstream location (25.01km/h) and downstream location (24.66km/h) to pedestrian crosswalk (19.73km/h), respectively. By contrast, the speed reduction effects were minimal for stop and yield signs, flashing yellow lights, and crossings without treatment.
CONCLUSIONS: Consequently, in order to reduce vehicle speeds and improve pedestrian safety at mid-blocks, several speed control measures such as speed humps, speed bumps, and transverse rumble strips are recommended to be deployed in the vicinity of pedestrian crosswalks.
Language: en |