Citation

杨. Sci. Law. 2017; 2017(01): 159-168.

Vernacular Title

比较法视角下儿童保护强制报告制度特征探析

Copyright

(Copyright © 2017, 法律科學编辑部)

DOI

unavailable

PMID

unavailable

Abstract

The United States, Canada, Australia, New Zealand and Taiwan of China and many other countries and regions have established the mandatory reporting systems for child protection, which provide effective and active services to safeguard the children. Although there are differences among the provisions of each country, but have roughly the same contents, the main constituent elements of which mainly consist of the responsibility subject and the reporting content for mandatory reporting, the responsibility for failing to report and the protecting provisions for the responsibility subject etc. Through the comparative study of the constituent elements of mandatory reporting systems for child protection, these can be summed up with four characteristics: the preferential allocation for children rights, the active intervention and protection from the view of social law, the systematic and expanding protection contents, and the relatively minor comprehensive legal liability, which has important implications to improve China's tentative mandatory reporting systems for child protection in Anti-domestic Violence Law.

Language: zh

Vernacular Abstract

美国、加拿大、澳大利亚、新西兰和我国的台湾等许多国家和地区都已经建立了儿童保护强制报告制度,为儿童提供有效的先发式保护。尽管各国的具体规定存在区别,但有着大致相同的内容,其构成要素主要包括强制报告的责任主体、报告的内容、未能报告的责任和保护报告主体的规定等。通过对各国儿童保护强制报告制度构成要素的比较研究,可归纳出该项制度具有儿童权利的倾斜性配置、社会法视角下的主动干预保护、系统性和扩张性的保护内容以及相对轻微性综合性的法律责任四项特征,这对于完善我国《反家庭暴力法》中初步构建的儿童保护强制报告制度有着重要的启示意义。