SAFETYLIT WEEKLY UPDATE

We compile citations and summaries of about 400 new articles every week.
RSS Feed

HELP: Tutorials | FAQ
CONTACT US: Contact info

Search Results

Journal Article

Citation

Takahashi M, Araie Y, Satoh Y, Iwasaki SI. Dent. Traumatol. 2017; 33(4): 288-294.

Affiliation

Department of Physiology, The Nippon Dental University School of Life Dentistry at Niigata, 1-8, Hamaura-cho, Chuo-ku, Niigata, 951-8580, Japan.

Copyright

(Copyright © 2017, John Wiley and Sons)

DOI

10.1111/edt.12335

PMID

28296061

Abstract

BACKGROUND/AIM: Mouthguards can reduce the risk of sports-related injuries such as tooth fracture or avulsion, but the sheet material and thickness have a large effect on their efficacy and safety. The aim of this study was to investigate the effect of the continuous use of a vacuum-forming machine on mouthguard thickness MATERIALS AND METHODS: Ethylene vinyl acetate sheets and olefin copolymer sheets were used for thermoforming with a vacuum-forming machine. The working model was trimmed to a height of 23 mm at the maxillary central incisor and 20 mm at maxillary first molar. During molding, the model was placed at the center of the vacuum unit. Three molding conditions were investigated: 1) molding was carried out after the sag at the center of the softened sheet was 15 mm below the clamp (control); 2) sheet heating started 5 min after the control, and molding in the same way as the control (AF5); and 3) sheet heating started 10 min after the control, and molding in the same way as the control (AF10). Under each condition, vacuum forming was conducted for 30 s. Sheet thickness after fabrication was determined for the incisal edge, labial surface, cusp, and buccal surface using a special caliper accurate to 0.1 mm. The differences of the molding conditions on the thickness in each sheet material were analyzed by one-way analysis of variance and Bonferroni's multiple comparison tests RESULTS: For both sheet materials, significant differences between the control and AF5 were observed at all measurement points (p < 0.01), but not between the control and AF10. Compared with the control, AF5 was thinner and AF10 was a similar thickness CONCLUSION: The continuous use of a vacuum-forming machine led to a reduction in the thickness of the mouthguard. Intervals of 10 min are necessary to achieve consistent molding. This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved.

This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved.


Language: en

Keywords

continuous use; mouthguard; shape change; thermoforming; thickness; vacuum formation

NEW SEARCH


All SafetyLit records are available for automatic download to Zotero & Mendeley
Print