SAFETYLIT WEEKLY UPDATE

We compile citations and summaries of about 400 new articles every week.
RSS Feed

HELP: Tutorials | FAQ
CONTACT US: Contact info

Search Results

Journal Article

Citation

Shakya HB, Fleming P, Saggurti N, Donta B, Silverman JG, Raj A. Soc. Sci. Med. (1982) 2017; 179: 97-105.

Affiliation

Center on Gender Equity and Health, Division of Global Public Health, School of Medicine, University of California San Diego, UCSD Department of Medicine, Division of Global Public Health, 9500 Gilman Drive, #0507, La Jolla, CA 92093-0507, USA. Electronic address: anitaraj@ucsd.edu.

Copyright

(Copyright © 2017, Elsevier Publishing)

DOI

10.1016/j.socscimed.2017.02.032

PMID

28260640

Abstract

We conducted longitudinal analyses examining the associations between intimate partner violence (IPV) attitudes and women's reported IPV in couples (N = 762) using 3 waves of data from a randomized controlled trial in Maharashtra, India. We found that, between Waves 1 and 2, men's and women's acceptance of IPV in the overall population decreased significantly while reports of IPV increased. These changes, we hypothesize, are evidence of an exogenous shock, possibly a high profile rape in Delhi in December 2012, that may have impacted the entire population. Cross-sectional associations between men's attitudes towards IPV and reported IPV were not significant in Wave 1, while positively and significantly associated in Waves 2 and 3. Longitudinal analysis showed that reduction in men's acceptance of IPV between Waves 1 and 2 was associated with a lower likelihood of reported IPV in Wave 3. Women's Wave 1 acceptance of IPV was positively associated with reported IPV in the Wave 1 cross-sectional analysis, while Wave 2 and Wave 3 measures of IPV acceptance were negatively associated with reported IPV in Waves 2 and 3 respectively. Longitudinal analyses of the change in women's attitudes towards IPV from Wave 1 to 2 and reported IPV in Wave 3 were insignificant. However, When women first reported IPV in Waves 2 or 3 they were less likely to report acceptance of IPV in that same wave.

FINDINGS suggest that changes in husbands' IPV acceptance is predictive of subsequent IPV, while newly experienced IPV predicts decreased IPV acceptance for women. Wave 2 and Wave 3 results were significant for the control group only, evidence that the intervention affected those associations, potentially changing attitudes more quickly than behavior. We recommend interventions that expose community opposition to IPV as a new social norm, and analysis of how the 2012 Delhi rape case may have affected these norms.

Copyright © 2017. Published by Elsevier Ltd.


Language: en

Keywords

Attitudes; Couples level data; India; Intimate partner violence; Randomized controlled trial; Social norms

NEW SEARCH


All SafetyLit records are available for automatic download to Zotero & Mendeley
Print