Citation

Noorani I. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. B Biol. Sci. 2017; 372(1718): e0191.

Affiliation

Department of Physiology, Development and Neuroscience, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, CB2 3EG, UK in1@sanger.ac.uk.

Copyright

(Copyright © 2017, Royal Society of London)

DOI

10.1098/rstb.2016.0191

PMID

28242725

Abstract

For precise motor control, we must be able to not only initiate movements with appropriate timing, but also stop them. The importance of stopping tended to be overlooked in research in favour of studying movement itself, so we are still only beginning to understand the neural basis of action cancellation. However, the development of models of behaviour in a wider range of tasks, and their relation to neural recordings has provided great insight into the underlying neurophysiology. Here we focus on developments of the linear approach to threshold with ergodic rate (LATER) model, relating these to complementary neurophysiological studies. It is tempting to consider that there may be a unifying mechanism for cancelling impending decisions in many contexts and how future efforts may clarify this possibility.This article is part of the themed issue 'Movement suppression: brain mechanisms for stopping and stillness'.

© 2017 The Author(s).

Language: en

Keywords

brain; decision; eye; movement; stop