Citation

Sefrioui I, Amadini R, Mauro J, El Fallahi A, Gabbrielli M. Eur. J. Trauma Emerg. Surg. 2017; 43(6): 805-822.

Affiliation

Department of Computer Science, University of Bologna/Lab. Focus INRIA, Bologna, Italy.

Copyright

(Copyright © 2017, Holtzbrinck Springer Nature Publishing Group)

DOI

10.1007/s00068-016-0757-3

PMID

28229175

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Exceptional circumstances like major incidents or natural disasters may cause a huge number of victims that might not be immediately and simultaneously saved. In these cases it is important to define priorities avoiding to waste time and resources for not savable victims. Trauma and Injury Severity Score (TRISS) methodology is the well-known and standard system usually used by practitioners to predict the survival probability of trauma patients. However, practitioners have noted that the accuracy of TRISS predictions is unacceptable especially for severely injured patients. Thus, alternative methods should be proposed.

METHODS: In this work we evaluate different approaches for predicting whether a patient will survive or not according to simple and easily measurable observations. We conducted a rigorous, comparative study based on the most important prediction techniques using real clinical data of the US National Trauma Data Bank.

RESULTS: Empirical results show that well-known Machine Learning classifiers can outperform the TRISS methodology. Based on our findings, we can say that the best approach we evaluated is Random Forest: it has the best accuracy, the best area under the curve, and k-statistic, as well as the second-best sensitivity and specificity. It has also a good calibration curve. Furthermore, its performance monotonically increases as the dataset size grows, meaning that it can be very effective to exploit incoming knowledge. Considering the whole dataset, it is always better than TRISS. Finally, we implemented a new tool to compute the survival of victims. This will help medical practitioners to obtain a better accuracy than the TRISS tools.

CONCLUSION: Random Forests may be a good candidate solution for improving the predictions on survival upon the standard TRISS methodology.

Language: en

Keywords

Classification; Machine learning; National trauma data bank; Survival prediction; TRISS methodology; Trauma patients