Citation

Sankarpandi SK, Baldwin AJ, Ray J, Mazzà C. BMC Ear Nose Throat Disord. 2017; 17: 1.

Affiliation

0000 0004 1936 9262grid.11835.3eINSIGNEO Institute for in silico Medicine, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK ; 0000 0004 1936 9262grid.11835.3eDepartment of Mechanical Engineering, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK.

Copyright

(Copyright © 2017, Holtzbrinck Springer Nature Publishing Group - BMC)

DOI

10.1186/s12901-017-0034-z

PMID

28184173

PMCID

PMC5289044

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Vestibular disorders affect an individual's stability, balance, and gait and predispose them to falls. Traditional laboratory-based semi-objective vestibular assessments are intrusive and cumbersome provide little information about their functional ability. Commercially available wearable inertial sensors allow us to make this real life assessments objective, with a detailed view of their functional abilities. Timed Up and Go (TUG) and Postural Sway tests are commonly used tests for gait and balance assessments. Our aim was to assess the feasibility, test-retest reliability and ability to classify fall status in individuals with vestibular disorders using parameters derived from the commercially available wearable system (inertial sensors and the Mobility Lab Software, APDM, Inc.).

METHODS: We recruited 27 individuals diagnosed either with unilateral or bilateral vestibular loss on vestibular function testing. Instrumented Timed Up and Go (iTUG) and Postural Sway (iSway) were administered three times during the first session and then repeated at a similar time the following week. To evaluate within and between sessions reliability of the parameters the Intra-Class Correlation coefficient (ICC) was used. Subsequently, the ability of reliable parameters (ICC ≥ 0.8) to classify fallers from non-fallers was estimated.

RESULTS: The iTUG test parameters showed good within and between sessions' reliability with mean ICC (between-sessions) values of 0.81 ± 0.17 and 0.69 ± 0.15, respectively. For the iSway test, the relative figures were; 0.76 ± 0.13 and 0.71 ± 0.14, respectively. A retrospective falls classification analysis with past 12 months falls history data yielded an accuracy of 66.70% with an area under the curve of 0.79. Mean Distance from centre of COP (mm) of accelerometer's trajectory (m/s(2)) from the iSway test was the only significant parameter to classify fallers from non-fallers.

CONCLUSIONS: Using a commercially available wearable system a subset of reliable iTUG and iSway parameters were identified and their ability to classify fallers were estimated. These parameters have potential to augment assessments of vestibular patients to enable clinicians and therapists to provide objective, tailored, personalised interventions for their gait and postural control and also to objectively evaluate and monitor the efficiency of their interventions.

Language: en

Keywords

OPAL inertial sensors; Reliability; TUG and sway tests; Vestibular disorders