SAFETYLIT WEEKLY UPDATE

We compile citations and summaries of about 400 new articles every week.
RSS Feed

HELP: Tutorials | FAQ
CONTACT US: Contact info

Search Results

Journal Article

Citation

Bertholet N, Daeppen JB, McNeely J, Kushnir V, Cunningham JA. Subst. Abuse 2017; 38(3): 285-291.

Affiliation

Australian National University, Canberra, Australian Capital Territory , Australia.

Copyright

(Copyright © 2017, Informa - Taylor and Francis Group)

DOI

10.1080/08897077.2017.1281860

PMID

28113039

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Technology-delivered interventions are useful tools for addressing unhealthy alcohol use. Smartphones in particular offer opportunities to deliver interventions at the user's convenience. We developed a smartphone application with 5 modules (personal feedback, self-monitoring of drinking, designated driver tool, blood alcohol content calculator, information). We assessed its acceptability and associations between use and drinking outcomes.

METHODS: 130 adults with unhealthy alcohol use (>14 (men)/ >7 (women) drinks/week or > = 1 episode/month with 6 or more drinks) recruited in Switzerland (n = 70) and Canada (n = 60) were offered to use the application. Follow-up occurred after 3 months. We assessed appreciation, usefulness and self-reported frequency of use of the modules, and drinking outcomes (drinks/week, binge drinking). Associations between application use and drinking at 3 months were evaluated with negative binomial and logistic regression models, adjusted for baseline values and gender.

RESULTS: 48% of participants were women, mean (SD) age: 32.8(10.0). Follow-up rate: 86.2%. There were changes from baseline (BL) to follow-up (FU) in number of drinks/week, BL: 15.0(16.5); FU: 10.9(10.5), p = 0.01, and binge drinking, BL: 95.4%; FU: 64.3%, p<0.0001. All modules had median ratings between 6 and 8 (scale of 1-10). 77% of participants used the application; 76% used the personal feedback module, 41% the self-monitoring of drinking, 22% the designated driver tool, 53% the BAC calculator, and 31% the information module. Participants using the application more than once reported significantly fewer drinks/week at follow up: IRR (number of drinks per week) 0.70 (0.51; 0.96).

CONCLUSIONS: A smartphone application for unhealthy alcohol use appears acceptable and useful (although there is room for improvement). Without prompting, its use is infrequent. Those who used the application more than once reported less weekly drinking than those who did not. Efficacy of the application should be tested in a randomized trial with strategies to increase frequency of its use.


Language: en

Keywords

Alcohol; brief intervention; electronic intervention; smartphone

NEW SEARCH


All SafetyLit records are available for automatic download to Zotero & Mendeley
Print