CONTACT US: Contact info
|
Citation |
Bell Holleran LL, Vaughan TJ, Vandiver DM. Behav. Sci. Law 2017; 34(6): 742-766. |
|
Affiliation |
Texas State University, School of Criminal Justice, TX. |
|
Copyright |
(Copyright © 2017, John Wiley and Sons) |
|
DOI |
|
PMID |
28098410 |
|
Abstract |
Previous studies have found aggravating, mitigating, and null effects of defendant histories of abuse and neglect on punishment preferences in capital sentencing. Perceiving these defendants as more dangerous, jurors may be more likely to favor the death penalty when such evidence is presented. This is counter to the intuition that abuse or neglect reduces culpability, and therefore mitigates the severity of punishment. We investigated the effect of defendant childhood physical abuse, sexual abuse, or neglect on the probability of a prospective juror preferring the death penalty in an between-subject experimental design. Using vignettes and two large samples (students and jurors), defendant histories were found to mitigate the probability that the hypothetical defendant received the death penalty, with sexual abuse having the most salient effect. Further, the effects were conditioned by preference for the death penalty - larger mitigating effects were observed among individuals who favor the death penalty. These findings suggest that initial judgments of abuse and neglect are related to juror leniency, and further research on the interaction of jury instructions and defendant histories is needed. Copyright © 2017 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. Language: en |