Citation

Lewis A, Pope TM. Neurocrit. Care 2017; 26(3): 446-449.

Affiliation

Mitchell Hamline School of Law, 875 Summit Avenue, Saint Paul, MN, 55105, USA.

Copyright

(Copyright © 2017, Holtzbrinck Springer Nature Publishing Group)

DOI

10.1007/s12028-017-0375-x

PMID

28078616

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Three recent lawsuits that address declaration of brain death (BD) garnered significant media attention and threaten to limit physician power to declare BD.

METHODS: We discuss these cases and their consequences including: the right to refuse an apnea test, accepted medical standards for declaration of BD, and the irreversibility of BD.

RESULTS: These cases warrant discussion because they threaten to: limit physicians' power to determine death; incite families to seek injunctions to continue organ support after BD; and force hospitals to dispense valuable resources to dead patients in lieu of patients with reparable illnesses or injuries.

CONCLUSIONS: Physicians, philosophers, religious officials, ethicists, and lawyers must work together to address these issues and educate both the public and medical community about BD.

Language: en

Keywords

Brain death; Death by neurologic criteria; Medicolegal; UDDA