SAFETYLIT WEEKLY UPDATE

We compile citations and summaries of about 400 new articles every week.
RSS Feed

HELP: Tutorials | FAQ
CONTACT US: Contact info

Search Results

Journal Article

Citation

Gallione C, Dal Molin A, Cristina FB, Ferns H, Mattioli M, Suardi B. J. Clin. Nurs. 2017; 26(15-16): 2154-2176.

Affiliation

Master of Science in Nursing, Clinical Education Coordinator of Nursing School, Department of Translational Medicine, University of Eastern Piedmont, Novara/"Maggiore della Carità" University Hospital, Via Lanino 1, 28100, Novara.

Copyright

(Copyright © 2017, John Wiley and Sons)

DOI

10.1111/jocn.13721

PMID

28042891

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The mistreatment of older people represents a widespread problem, with exponential growth risk, especially considering the progressive ageing of the world population. It could have serious consequences for the victim's health if not recognised early, denounced and stopped. Abuse is often undetected by service providers because there is a lack of awareness surrounding the magnitude of the problem. Education and formal training in the signs of abuse are also generally poorly developed, as are reporting procedures which would lead to further investigation.

AIMS AND OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study is to review the efficacy and accuracy of tools administered to older people, intended to detect and measure elder abuse.

DESIGN: Systematic review.

METHODS: Comprehensive database searches of MEDLINE, Cochrane, EMBASE, SCOPUS were undertaken. Screening of 695 articles resulted in 11 included. Appraisal and analysis using PRISMA Statement and STROBE checklist were undertaken.

RESULTS: 11 screening tools have been presented: H-S/EAST, VASS, EASI, CASE, BASE, E-IOA, EAI, EPAS, CPEABS, OAPAM, OAFEM, all aimed at health care professional or, in some cases, expected to be specifically used by nurses.

CONCLUSIONS: The fundamental function of any assessment instrument is to guide through a standardised screening process and to ensure that signs of abuse are not missed. Several tools have been tested; some have demonstrated a moderate to good internal consistency and some have been validated to allow an early identification. None have been evaluated against measurable violence or health outcomes. RELEVANCE TO CLINICAL PRACTICE: Nurses and all health care providers should screen patients routinely. However, we are not able to recommend a single tool since the selection and implementation has to be appropriate to the setting. Furthermore, the study population and the possibility of using multiple tools in combination should be taken in consideration, to assess all the aspects of violence. This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved.

This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved.


Language: en

NEW SEARCH


All SafetyLit records are available for automatic download to Zotero & Mendeley
Print