Citation

Mousavi SG, Amini M, Mahaki B, Bagherian-Sararoudi R. Adv. Biomed. Res. 2016; 5: e184.

Affiliation

Department of Psychiatry, Behavioral Sciences Research Center, School of Medicine, Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, Isfahan, Iran.

Copyright

(Copyright © 2016, Medknow Publications)

DOI

10.4103/2277-9175.190990

PMID

28028524

Abstract

BACKGROUND: To evaluate the efficacy of different ways of communications on prevention of suicidal reattempt, we compared the efficacy of phone call versus face-to-face follow-up in patients with previous attempt.

MATERIALS AND METHODS: In a randomized controlled clinical trial, 55 suicide reattempters who were admitted to the poisoning emergency were divided into phone call (29 patients) and face-to-face (26 patients) groups randomly. They were followed at 8 occasions: 2(nd) and 4(th) weeks, and the 2(nd), 3(rd), 4(th), 5(th), 6(th), and 8(th) months. The suicidal reattempt, suicidal thought, hope, and interest of the patients were assessed on each occasion, and the patients were guided to visit by a therapist, if needed. The findings were analyzed by Mann-Whitney, Chi-square, Cochran, Friedman, and independent t-tests using SPSS 20.

RESULTS: The status of "hope" and "interest" improved in both groups, but it showed more significant difference in the face-to-face group. Suicidal thoughts in both groups decreased over time, and this was more significant in the face-to-face group. However, we did not found any significant difference in the frequency of the suicidal reattempts between two groups.

CONCLUSION: Face-to-face versus phone call follow-up of suicide attempters can significantly alleviate suicidal thoughts and improve hopes and interests.

Language: en