Citation

Waern M, Kaiser N, Renberg ES. BMC Psychiatry 2016; 16(1): e440.

Affiliation

Department of Clinical Sciences, Division of Psychiatry, Umeå University, Umeå, Sweden.

Copyright

(Copyright © 2016, Holtzbrinck Springer Nature Publishing Group - BMC)

DOI

10.1186/s12888-016-1147-4

PMID

27938368

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Clinical guidelines for suicide prevention often stress the identification of risk and protective factors as well as the evaluation of suicidal intent. However, we know very little about what psychiatrists actually do when they make these assessments. The aim was to investigate psychiatrists' own accounts of suicide assessment consultations, with a focus on their behaviors, attitudes and emotions.

METHOD: Semi-structured in depth interviews were carried out with a purposive selection of 15 psychiatrists.

RESULTS: Thematic analysis revealed three main themes: understanding the patient in a precarious situation, understanding one's own reactions, and understanding how the doctor-patient relationship impacted on risk assessment and management decisions. Emotional contact and credibility issues were common subthemes that arose when the respondents talked about trying to understand the patient. The psychiatrists stressed the semi-intuitive nature of their assessments. Problems related to the use of risk factor assessments and rating scales were apparent. Assessment consultations could evoke physical and emotional symptoms of anxiety, and concerns about responsibility could lead to repressive management decisions. In situations of mutual trust, however, the assessment consultation could kick-start a therapeutic process.

CONCLUSION: This study highlights psychiatrists' experiences in clinical suicide assessment situations.

FINDINGS have implications for professional development as well as for service delivery.

Language: en