CONTACT US: Contact info
|
Citation |
Reagan IJ, Brumbelow ML. Accid. Anal. Prev. 2017; 99: 44-50. |
|
Affiliation |
Insurance Institute for Highway Safety, Research 1005 N. Glebe RD, Suite 800, Arlington VA, 22201, United States. |
|
Copyright |
(Copyright © 2017, Elsevier Publishing) |
|
DOI |
|
PMID |
27866073 |
|
Abstract |
A previous open-road experiment indicated that curve-adaptive HID headlights driven with low beams improved drivers' detection of low conspicuity targets compared with fixed halogen and fixed HID low beam systems. The current study used the same test environment and targets to assess whether drivers' detection of targets was affected by the same three headlight systems when using high beams. Twenty drivers search and responded for 60 8×12inch targets of high or low reflectance that were distributed evenly across straight and curved road sections as they drove at 30 mph on an unlit two-lane rural road. The results indicate that target detection performance was generally similar across the three systems. However, one interaction indicated that drivers saw low reflectance targets on straight road sections from further away when driving with the fixed halogen high beam condition compared with curve-adaptive HID high beam headlights and also indicated a possible benefit for the curve-adaptive HID high beams for high reflectance targets placed on the inside of curves. The results of this study conflict with the previous study of low beams, which showed a consistent benefit for the curve-adaptive HID low beams for targets placed on curves compared with fixed HID and fixed halogen low beam conditions. However, a comparison of mean detection distances from the two studies indicated uniformly longer mean target detection distances for participants driving with high beams and implicates the potential visibility benefits for systems that optimize proper high beam use. Language: en |