SAFETYLIT WEEKLY UPDATE

We compile citations and summaries of about 400 new articles every week.
RSS Feed

HELP: Tutorials | FAQ
CONTACT US: Contact info

Search Results

Journal Article

Citation

Orsi GB, Rossini A, Gabriele S, Sticca G, Gillespie F, Fara GM. Ann. Ig. 2002; 14(3): 189-196.

Vernacular Title

Attività del Centro Antirabbico di Roma nel 2000: analisi e proposte.

Affiliation

Dipartimento di Scienze di Sanità Pubblica, Università degli Studi di Roma La Sapienza, P.le Aldo Moro 5, 00185 Roma.

Copyright

(Copyright © 2002, Societa Editrice Universo)

DOI

unavailable

PMID

12162116

Abstract

The Authors analyzed data from the 1,817 patients (mean age 35.3 +/- 20.6, median 32) treated at the Antirabies Centre of Rome in the year 2000; of these 8.9% were immigrants. Dogs (84.1%) and cats (9.8%) were responsible for most bites. Stray animals were 39.9%, with an owner 58.3% and those without data 1.8%. Over 1/3 of patients could not refer the cause of bite. Most patients (93.0%) went first to hospital, where tetanus prophylaxis was administered preferably by immunoglobulins (25.0%) instead of vaccine (6.6%). Antirabies vaccine (HDCV and/or DEV) was prescribed to 777 patients (42.8%) and administered to 642 (35.3%), but only 296 (16.3%) of them received at least 5 doses. Veterinary observation always confirmed the absence of rabies in central Italy. Immunoglobulins were prescribed only to 14 patients. The data shown in this study emphasize the opportunity to differentiate the Italian antirabies protocol according to the geographic area.

Keywords: Animal Bites; Dog Bites


Language: it

NEW SEARCH


All SafetyLit records are available for automatic download to Zotero & Mendeley
Print