|
Citation
|
Arnaud N, Diestelkamp S, Wartberg L, Sack PM, Daubmann A, Thomasius R. Acad. Emerg. Med. 2016; 24(2): 186-200. |
|
Abstract
|
OBJECTIVES: The proportion of children and adolescents receiving emergency care for acute alcohol intoxication (AAI) in Germany has sharply increased over the past years. Despite this, no randomized controlled trials (RCTs) have studied guideline- and evidence-based interventions to prevent future alcohol misuse within this population. The objective of our investigation was to evaluate the effectiveness of a brief motivational intervention (b-MI) to reduce drinking and associated problems within pediatric emergency departments (PED) in Hamburg, Germany.
METHODS: This stratified cluster-RCT compared a widely established but modified targeted b-MI and treatment as usual (TAU) for patients recruited and treated on Fridays, Saturdays or Sundays from July 2011 to January 2014 for AAI in emergency departments of 6 pediatric hospitals in Hamburg, Germany. Patients under the age of 18 years and their caregivers were included in the study. Intervention was delivered by trained hospital-external staff. The intervention group (n=141) received a single session b-MI with a telephone booster after 6 weeks and a brief consultation for caregivers. All intervention material was manual-based. The TAU control group (n=175) received youth-specific written information on alcohol use and contact information for community resources. Primary outcomes were changes in binge drinking frequency, number of alcoholic drinks on a typical occasion and alcohol-related problems using the brief Rutgers Alcohol Problem Index. Outcomes were measured by research assistants not involved in intervention delivery. Baseline data were collected in person at the PED, and follow-up data were collected via telephone 3- and 6-months after baseline. Secondary outcome was post-enrollment health service utilization. Analyses were based on linear mixed models and intent-to-treat.
RESULTS: 86.1% (87.5%) of patients in the b-MI group and 82.4% (86.9%) in the TAU group provided valid outcome data after 3 (6) -months respectively. The differences between groups for all outcomes were statistically non-significant at both follow-ups (P >.05). After 3-months the mean change in binge drinking frequency was -1.36 (95% confidence interval [CI], -1.81 to -0.91), a reduction of 62.1% in the b-MI group and -1.29 (95% CI, -1.77 to -0.95), a reduction of 49.0% in the TAU group. The mean change in number of alcoholic drinks on a typical occasion was -2.24 (95% CI, -3.18 to -1.29), a reduction of 37.5% in the b-MI group and -1.34 (95% CI, -2.54 to -0.14), a reduction of 26.4% in the TAU group. The mean change of alcohol-related problems was -6.72 (95% CI, -7.68 to -5.76), a reduction of 60.5% in the b-MI group and -6.43 (95% CI, -7.37 to -5.49), a reduction of 58.3% in the TAU group. The difference in mean changes between groups were similar after 6-months for all outcomes.
CONCLUSION AND RELEVANCE: This study provides new information on the effectiveness of b-MIs delivered at discharge of young AAI patients in emergency care. Both trial groups reduced alcohol use and related problems but the b-MI was not associated with significant effects. Though the intervention approach appears feasible, further considerations of improving the outcomes for this relevant target group are required. This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved.
This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved.
Language: en |