Citation

Dillon G, Hussain R, Loxton D, Khan A. PLoS One 2016; 11(9): e0162380.

Affiliation

School of Health and Rehabilitation Services, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, QLD, 4072, Australia.

Copyright

(Copyright © 2016, Public Library of Science)

DOI

10.1371/journal.pone.0162380

PMID

27622559

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To investigate differences in self-reported health among Australian women with a history of intimate partner violence (IPV) in relation to rurality of residence.

METHODS: Data were drawn from six survey waves of the Australian Longitudinal Study on Women's Health 1973-78 birth cohort. Self-reported general and mental health scores derived from the SF-36 scale were compared for women with a history of IPV living in metropolitan, regional and rural areas. Multivariable generalised estimating equations were constructed adjusting for income hardship, number of children, education, social support, age and marital status.

RESULTS: Women with a history of IPV living in regional and rural areas had no significant differences in self-reported general health scores compared to their metropolitan counterparts. Rural women affected by IPV had slightly better self-reported mental health than equivalent women living in metropolitan or regional areas. The socio-demographic factors with the strongest association with self-reported health were income, education, social support, and number of children.

CONCLUSIONS: Women in regional and rural areas were no more disadvantaged, in terms of self-reported general health or mental health, than IPV affected women living in major cities in Australia.

Language: en