SAFETYLIT WEEKLY UPDATE

We compile citations and summaries of about 400 new articles every week.
RSS Feed

HELP: Tutorials | FAQ
CONTACT US: Contact info

Search Results

Journal Article

Citation

Boyé NDA, van der Velde N, de Vries OJ, van Lieshout EM, Hartholt KA, Mattace-Raso FU, Lips P, Patka P, Van Beeck EF, van der Cammen TJ. Age Ageing 2016; ePub(ePub): ePub.

Affiliation

Section of Geriatric Medicine, Department of Internal Medicine, Erasmus MC, University Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.

Copyright

(Copyright © 2016, Oxford University Press)

DOI

10.1093/ageing/afw161

PMID

27614080

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: to investigate the effect of withdrawal of fall-risk-increasing-drugs (FRIDs) versus 'care as usual' on reducing falls in community-dwelling older fallers.

DESIGN: randomised multicentre trial. PARTICIPANTS: six hundred and twelve older adults who visited an Emergency Department (ED) because of a fall. INTERVENTIONS: withdrawal of FRIDs. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: primary outcome was time to the first self-reported fall. Secondary outcomes were time to the second self-reported fall and to falls requiring a general practitioner (GP)-consultation or ED-visit. Intention-to-treat (primary) and a per-protocol (secondary) analysis were conducted. The hazard ratios (HRs) for time-to-fall were calculated using a Cox-regression model. Differences in cumulative incidence of falls were analysed using Poisson regression.

RESULTS: during 12 months follow-up, 91 (34%) control and 115 (37%) intervention participants experienced a fall; 35% of all attempted interventions were unsuccessful, either due to recurrence of the initial indication for prescribing, additional medication for newly diagnosed conditions or non-compliance. Compared to baseline, the overall percentage of users of ≥3 FRIDs at 12 months did not change in either the intervention or the control group. Our intervention did not have a significant effect on time to first fall (HR 1.17; 95% confidence interval 0.89-1.54), time to second fall (1.19; 0.78-1.82), time to first fall-related GP-consultation (0.66; 0.42-1.06) or time to first fall-related ED-visit (0.85; 0.43-1.68).

CONCLUSION: in this population of complex multimorbid patients visiting an ED because of a fall, our single intervention of FRIDs-withdrawal was not effective in reducing falls. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Netherlands Trial Register NTR1593.

© The Author 2016. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the British Geriatrics Society. All rights reserved. For Permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oup.com.


Language: en

NEW SEARCH


All SafetyLit records are available for automatic download to Zotero & Mendeley
Print