Citation

Robertson GA, Wood AM. Br. Med. Bull. 2016; 119(1): 111-128.

Affiliation

Edinburgh Orthopaedic Trauma Unit, Royal Infirmary of Edinburgh, Edinburgh EH16 4SA, UK.

Copyright

(Copyright © 2016, British Council, Publisher Oxford University Press)

DOI

10.1093/bmb/ldw029

PMID

27554280

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: This review aims to provide information on the return rates and return times to sport following clavicle fractures. SOURCES OF DATA: A systematic search of Medline, EMBASE, CINAHAL, Cochrane, Web of Science, PEDro, SPORTDiscus, Scopus and Google Scholar was performed using the keywords 'clavicle', 'clavicular', 'fractures', 'athletes', 'sports', 'non-operative', 'conservative', 'operative', 'return to sport'. AREAS OF AGREEMENT: Twenty-three studies were included: 10 reported on mid-shaft fractures, 14 on lateral fractures. The management principles for athletic patients were to attempt non-operative management for undisplaced fractures to undertake operative intervention for displaced lateral fractures and to recommend operative intervention for displaced mid-shaft fractures. AREAS OF CONTROVERSY: The optimal surgical modality for mid-shaft and lateral clavicle fractures. GROWING POINTS: Operative management of displaced mid-shaft fractures offers improved return rates and times to sport compared to non-operative management. Suture fixation and non-acromio-clavicular joint (ACJ)-spanning plate fixation of displaced lateral fractures show promising results. AREAS TIMELY FOR DEVELOPING RESEARCH: Future prospective studies should aim to establish the optimal treatment modalities for clavicle fractures.

© The Author 2016. Published by Oxford University Press. All rights reserved. For permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oup.com.

Language: en