SAFETYLIT WEEKLY UPDATE

We compile citations and summaries of about 400 new articles every week.
RSS Feed

HELP: Tutorials | FAQ
CONTACT US: Contact info

Search Results

Journal Article

Citation

Carpenter B, Tait G, Stobbs N, Barnes M. J. Judic. Adm. 2015; 24(3): 172-183.

Copyright

(Copyright © 2015, Australasian Institute of Judicial Administration, Publisher Thompson-Reuters : Lawbook Australia)

DOI

unavailable

PMID

unavailable

Abstract

In common law countries such as England and Australia, violent and otherwise unnatural deaths are investigated by coroners who make findings as to the "manner of death". This includes determining whether the deceased person intentionally caused their own death. Previous research (Tait and Carpenter 2013a, 2013b, 2014) has suggested that coroners are reluctant to reach such determinations, citing the stigma of suicide and a need for sensitivity to grieving and traumatized families. Based on interviews with both English and Australian coroners, this paper explores whether an 'ethic of care' evident in English and Australian coronial suicide determinations, can be understood as an application of the 'practices and techniques' of therapeutic jurisprudence. Based on the ways in which coroners position the law as a potential therapeutic agent, we investigate how they understand their role and position as legal actors, and the effects of their decision making in the context of suspected suicides.


Language: en

NEW SEARCH


All SafetyLit records are available for automatic download to Zotero & Mendeley
Print