SAFETYLIT WEEKLY UPDATE

We compile citations and summaries of about 400 new articles every week.
RSS Feed

HELP: Tutorials | FAQ
CONTACT US: Contact info

Search Results

Journal Article

Citation

Banihabib ME. Cogent Eng. 2016; 3(1): e1127798.

Copyright

(Copyright © 2016, Informa - Taylor and Francis)

DOI

10.1080/23311916.2015.1127798

PMID

unavailable

Abstract

Flood forecasting is a core of flood forecasting and flood warning system which can be implemented by both conceptual rainfall-runoff (CRR) model and black-box rainfall-runoff (BBRR) model. Dynamic artificial neural network (DANN) as an innovative BBRR model and HEC-HMS as a traditional CRR model were used for flood forecasting. The aim of this paper is to compare the efficiency of HEC-HMS and DANN for the determination of flood warning lead-time (FWLT) in a steep urbanized watershed. A framework is proposed to compare the performance of the models based on four criteria: type and quantity of required input data by each model, flood simulation performance, FWLT and expected lead-time (ELT). Finally, the results show that FWLT and ELT were estimated longer by DANN than by HEC-HMS model. In brief, because of less required data by BBRR model and its longer ELT, future research should be focused on better verification of it.


Language: en

NEW SEARCH


All SafetyLit records are available for automatic download to Zotero & Mendeley
Print