SAFETYLIT WEEKLY UPDATE

We compile citations and summaries of about 400 new articles every week.
RSS Feed

HELP: Tutorials | FAQ
CONTACT US: Contact info

Search Results

Journal Article

Citation

Mathews R, Pratt C. Psychiatry Psychol. Law. 2016; 23(6): 842-848.

Copyright

(Copyright © 2016, Australian and New Zealand Association of Psychiatry, Psychology, and Law, Publisher Informa - Taylor and Francis Group)

DOI

10.1080/13218719.2016.1155510

PMID

unavailable

Abstract

A key aspect of psychological work is formal psychological testing using standardised tests and procedures. In Australia formal psychological testing is unique to psychologists and psychologists' training and ethical obligations under their Code of Ethics requires that they seek to protect test material from scrutiny by non-psychologists. Legal requests for psychological test material leading to exposure of such material is not in the public interest as it can lead to misuse, misinterpretation, and damage to the integrity of the test for future use by the public through the loss of effective assessment tools. This effectively results in harm to the public. This article aims to increase understanding of the reasons that psychologists seek to restrict access to formal psychological test material, identifies legal precedents to support the protection of the material, and provides a process for relevant outcomes of psychological testing to be used for legal purposes.

NEW SEARCH


All SafetyLit records are available for automatic download to Zotero & Mendeley
Print