CONTACT US: Contact info
|
Citation |
Fängström K, Bokström P, Dahlberg A, Calam R, Lucas S, Sarkadi A. Child Abuse Negl. 2016; 58: 160-172. |
|
Affiliation |
Department of Women's and Children's Health, Uppsala University, Islandsgatan 2, 75185 Uppsala, Sweden. Electronic address: anna.sarkadi@kbh.uu.se. |
|
Copyright |
(Copyright © 2016, Elsevier Publishing) |
|
DOI |
|
PMID |
27394051 |
|
Abstract |
Interviewing young children presents a challenge because they tend to provide incomplete accounts and are easily misled. Therefore there is a need for techniques to improve young children's recall, while maintaining accuracy and increasing completeness. The computer-assisted interview In My Shoes (IMS) is an aid that potentially offers a way for young children to provide accounts of their experiences. This study examined the validity of IMS, by comparing it with a forensic best practice interview approach using a real-life clinical situation to ensure high ecological validity. Children were randomly assigned to either method and both accuracy and completeness of statements made by 4- and 5-year-olds (N=54) regarding a video-documented health check-up were assessed. The In My Shoes interviews were as good as best practice interviews on all accuracy measures for both age groups, except for object accuracy that was better in the forensic interview condition. Events description completeness was similar in both interview conditions; however, IMS interviews generated more complete statements about people present at the visit. The findings suggest that the IMS approach yields comparable results to a best practice interview, and it can be used as an alternative aid in child interviews. Language: en |