Citation

Indermaur D. Aust. N. Zeal. J. Criminol. 2000; 33(3): 287-299.

Copyright

(Copyright © 2000, Australian and New Zealand Society of Criminology, Publisher SAGE Publishing)

DOI

10.1177/000486580003300303

PMID

unavailable

Abstract

This paper examines the evidence regarding the nature of violent crime in Australia. Although it is often assumed that violence is increasing and that violence represents an equal risk to all citizens, the evidence does not support these assumptions. A closer look at the data that is available suggests that violence is not increasing and the risks of violence are not equally spread. The effects of these misperceptions on public opinion, political strategy and crime policy is discussed. It is argued that the interplay between information and policy is complex. For example, the interests and proclivities of the public in seeing crime in a sensationalised way can not be dismissed. Further, the usefulness of crime and punishment to politicians looking for grand symbols is central to the politics of violence. It is argued that those responsible for crime policy can be encouraged to pursue more effective directions if policies are subjected to robust evaluations which are designed to test for outcomes in terms of improved public safety.

Language: en