Citation

Weatherburn D. Aust. N. Zeal. J. Criminol. 2005; 38(3): 416-420.

Copyright

(Copyright © 2005, Australian and New Zealand Society of Criminology, Publisher SAGE Publishing)

DOI

10.1375/acri.38.3.416

PMID

unavailable

Abstract

In a recent article in this journal Max Travers advanced the view that criminal justice evaluation is boring, biased and beset with methodological problems. As evidence of this he cited (among other things) an evaluation of the NSW Drug Court carried out by the present author and several of his colleagues. This article offers a brief response to Travers' claims.

Language: en