SAFETYLIT WEEKLY UPDATE

We compile citations and summaries of about 400 new articles every week.
RSS Feed

HELP: Tutorials | FAQ
CONTACT US: Contact info

Search Results

Journal Article

Citation

Niedermeier SR, Khan SN. Clin. Spine Surg. 2016; ePub(ePub): ePub.

Affiliation

Department of Orthopaedics, Wexner Medical Center at The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH, USA.

Copyright

(Copyright © 2016, Wolters Kluwer)

DOI

10.1097/BSD.0b013e31829eb82c

PMID

27196132

Abstract

STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective comparative study.

OBJECTIVE: To examine perioperative characteristics among polytraumatized patients with operative, unstable spine fractures with and without concomitant operative long-bone injuries. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Treatment of polytrauma patients has delicate and time-sensitive protocols to ensure successful recovery. The literature defines standards for vertebral injury and surgical intervention.Severely polytraumatized patients with an Injury Severity Score (ISS)≥15 were divided according to those with operative spine fractures with operative long bone fractures (OSFLBF) and those with operative spine fractures alone (OSFA).

METHODS: Patients were compared by gender, age, mechanism of injury (MOI), ISS, location of injuries, time spent inpatient before procedure(s), total time in the operating room, type of procedure(s) performed, estimated operative blood loss, complications, length of stay (LOS), and time to discharge.

RESULTS: In a 12-year period, more than 600 patients were admitted to our level I trauma center with polytrauma and unstable spine fracture. Twelve had sustained operative unstable spine injuries and 21 had unstable spine injuries with a long-bone injury requiring operative stabilization. Significant differences in ISS, LOS, MOI, region of vertebral injury, or total OR time between the two groups were not observed. Differences were seen concerning average blood loss during surgery and time-spent inpatient before entering the operating room. OSFLBF patients were discharged at a faster rate after 20 days compared to OSFSA patients.

CONCLUSIONS: No differences in ISS, LOS, MOI, region of vertebral injury or vertebral procedure, or total operating room time were observed. Blood loss was more substantial in the OSFLBF group, but it spent fewer days in the hospital preoperatively. Despite a non-statistical difference in LOS, a larger proportion of OSFA patients remained in the hospital after being inpatient for >20 days, reducing the risk for iatrogenic complication in that group compared to OSFA. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: III, retrospective comparative.


Language: en

NEW SEARCH


All SafetyLit records are available for automatic download to Zotero & Mendeley
Print