SAFETYLIT WEEKLY UPDATE

We compile citations and summaries of about 400 new articles every week.
RSS Feed

HELP: Tutorials | FAQ
CONTACT US: Contact info

Search Results

Journal Article

Citation

Mendoza A, Santoyo FL, Agulló A, Fenández-Cañamaque JL, Vivó C. Int. J. Burns Trauma 2016; 6(1): 1-10.

Affiliation

H. La Fe. Avenida Fernando Abril Martorell, 106 València 46026, Valencia, Spain.

Copyright

(Copyright © 2016, e-Century Publishing)

DOI

unavailable

PMID

27069760

PMCID

PMC4749394

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To describe the management of pain prevention associated with burn care.

METHODS: Multi-centre, observational, cross-sectional, descriptive study performed in 4 burn units in Spain.

RESULTS: A total of 55 patients undergoing 64 procedures were analysed. Burns were classified as severe (90.4%), third-degree (78.2%) and caused by thermal agents (81.8%). Background analgesia consisted of non-opioid drugs (87.5%) and opioids (54.7%) [morphine (20.3%), morphine and fentanyl (14.1%) or fentanyl monotherapy (15.6%)]. Burn care was performed by experienced nurses (96.9%); 36.5% followed guidelines. The mean duration of procedures was 44 minutes (Statistical Deviation, SD: 20.2) and the mean duration of pain was 27 minutes (SD: 44.6). Procedural pain was primarily managed with opioid analgesics: fentanyl monotherapy and in combination (84%) and fentanyl monotherapy (48%) administered sublingually (89.1%). Patients described pain as different to usual baseline pain (97%), with a mean maximum intensity score of 4.2 points (SD: 3.3) on the VAS scale and a 34% increase in the intensity of pain. The mean patient and healthcare professional satisfaction score per procedure was 6/10 (SD: 1.9) and 5.5/10 (SD: 1.7), respectively.

CONCLUSION: The results of the study describe the management of pain associated with burn care in clinical practice, helping optimise pain control.


Language: en

NEW SEARCH


All SafetyLit records are available for automatic download to Zotero & Mendeley
Print