Citation

Ford H, Trent S, Wickizer S. Am. J. Pharm. Educ. 2016; 80(2): e20.

Affiliation

South College School of Pharmacy, Knoxville, Tennessee.

Copyright

(Copyright © 2016, American Association of Colleges of Pharmacy)

DOI

10.5688/ajpe80220

PMID

27073273

PMCID

PMC4827571

Abstract

OBJECTIVE. To estimate pharmaceutical emergency preparedness of US states and commonwealth territories.

METHODS. A quantitative content analysis was performed to evaluate board of pharmacy legal documents (ie, statutes, rules, and regulations) for the presence of the 2006 Rules for Public Health Emergencies (RPHE) from the National Association of Boards of Pharmacy's (NABP) Model Pharmacy Practice Act.

RESULTS. The median number of state-adopted RPHE was one, which was significantly less than the hypothesized value of four. Rule Two, which recommended policies and procedures for reporting disasters, was adopted significantly more than other RPHE. Ten states incorporated language specific to public health emergency refill dispensing, and among these, only six allowed 30-day refill quantities.

CONCLUSION. Based on the 2006 NABP model rules, it does not appear that states are prepared to expedite an effective pharmaceutical response during a public health emergency. Boards of pharmacy should consider adding the eight RPHE to their state pharmacy practice acts.

Language: en