Citation

Gawlak D, Mańka-Malara K, Kamiński T, Łuniewska M, Mierzwińska-Nastalska E. Dent. Traumatol. 2016; 32(5): 416-420.

Affiliation

Department of Prosthodontics, Medical University of Warsaw, Warsaw, Poland.

Copyright

(Copyright © 2016, John Wiley and Sons)

DOI

10.1111/edt.12269

PMID

26948149

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Mouthguards provide an effective preventive method against the effects of injuries sustained during sports activities, in particular cycling, football [soccer], basketball, skiing or hockey. However, when placed in the oral cavity, they can induce disorders in basic physiological functions.

AIM: The objective of this clinical study was to compare the effects of various custom mouthguards with generally available standard boil and bite mouthguards on the functions of the oral cavity. MATERIAL AND METHODS: A total of a 168 mouthguards (five custom and three standard boil and bite mouthguards) were assessed in a questionnaire-based survey. Their negative effects on the integrity of mucosa, speech, breathing, salivary flow and taste as well as in terms of inducing gag reflex, tooth clenching and temporomandibular joint complaints were compared.

RESULTS: Porida mouthguard was reported to have the most adverse effects on oral functions. In the majority of the respondents, the remaining mouthguards did not have any adverse effects on the stomatognathic system functions.

CONCLUSIONS: Mouthguards do not significantly disturb basic functions of the stomatognathic system. Standard Porida mouthguards were shown to have the most unfavourable effect on oral functions.

© 2016 John Wiley & Sons A/S. Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

Language: en