Citation

Trippas D, Handley SJ, Verde MF, Morsanyi K. J. Exp. Psychol. Learn. Mem. Cogn. 2016; 42(9): 1448-1457.

Copyright

(Copyright © 2016, American Psychological Association)

DOI

10.1037/xlm0000248

PMID

26889685

Abstract

A key assumption of dual process theory is that reasoning is an explicit, effortful, deliberative process. The present study offers evidence for an implicit, possibly intuitive component of reasoning. Participants were shown sentences embedded in logically valid or invalid arguments. Participants were not asked to reason but instead rated the sentences for liking (Experiment 1) and physical brightness (Experiments 2-3). Sentences that followed logically from preceding sentences were judged to be more likable and brighter. Two other factors thought to be linked to implicit processing-sentence believability and facial expression-had similar effects on liking and brightness ratings. The authors conclude that sensitivity to logical structure was implicit, occurring potentially automatically and outside of awareness. They discuss the results within a fluency misattribution framework and make reference to the literature on discourse comprehension. (PsycINFO Database Record

Language: en