Citation

Dagirmanjian FB, Mahalik JR, Boland J, Colbow A, Dunn J, Pomarico A, Rappaport D. J. Interpers. Violence 2017; 32(15): 2275-2297.

Affiliation

District of Columbia Office of Victim Services and Justice Grants, Washington, DC, USA.

Copyright

(Copyright © 2017, SAGE Publishing)

DOI

10.1177/0886260515625511

PMID

26772666

Abstract

In this study, we examine men's constructions of violence and their explanations of their own violent behavior. Interviews were conducted with 12 adult men, employed in industrial and manual labor, regarding their associations with violence, their reasons for engaging in violent behavior, and their reasons for not engaging in violent behavior. Utilizing consensual qualitative research methodology, our findings indicated that men's constructions of violence and their justifications for engaging in violence were linked to their constructions of masculinity and what it meant to them to be a man.

RESULTS are discussed through the lenses of multiple gender-based theories and ultimately, deemed to demonstrate the most support for the notion of precarious manhood. Specifically, violence was viewed as necessary in particular situations to assert or maintain one's social status and sense of self as masculine when faced with threats to manhood status. Implications for psychological intervention and practice with men are discussed, including identifying positive alternatives to violence that preserve one's sense of self as masculine.

Language: en