Citation

Spasojevic MJ, Bahlai CA, Bradley BA, Butterfield BJ, Tuanmu MN, Sistla S, Wiederholt R, Suding KN. Glob. Chang. Biol. 2015; 22(4): 1421-1432.

Affiliation

Department of Environmental Science, Policy & Management, University of California Berkeley, Berkeley, CA, USA.

Copyright

(Copyright © 2015, John Wiley and Sons)

DOI

10.1111/gcb.13174

PMID

26599833

Abstract

Understanding the mechanisms underlying ecosystem resilience - why some systems have an irreversible response to disturbances while others recover - is critical for conserving biodiversity and ecosystem function in the face of global change. Despite the widespread acceptance of a positive relationship between biodiversity and resilience, empirical evidence for this relationship remains fairly limited in scope and localized in scale. Assessing resilience at the large landscape and regional scales most relevant to land management and conservation practices has been limited by the ability to measure both diversity and resilience over large spatial scales. Here, we combined tools used in large scale studies of biodiversity (remote sensing, trait databases) with theoretical advances developed from small scale experiments to ask if the functional diversity within a range of woodland and forest ecosystems influences the recovery of productivity after wildfires across the four-corners region of the United States. We additionally asked how environmental variation (topography, macroclimate) across this geographic region influences such resilience, either directly or indirectly via changes in functional diversity. Using structural equation modeling, we found that functional diversity in regeneration traits (fire tolerance, fire resistance, resprout ability) was a stronger predictor of the recovery of productivity after wildfire than the functional diversity of seed mass or species richness. Moreover, slope, elevation and aspect either directly or indirectly influenced the recovery of productivity, likely via their effect on microclimate, while macroclimate had no direct or indirect effects. Our study provides some of the first direct empirical evidence for functional diversity increasing resilience at large spatial scales. Our approach highlights the power of combining theory based on local scale studies with tools used in studies at large spatial scales and trait databases to understand pressing environmental issues. This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved.

Language: en