Citation

Zhang C, Wu X, Lin S, Jia Z, Cao J. PLoS One 2015; 10(11): e0142395.

Affiliation

Nursing Department, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Beijing, 100730, China.

Copyright

(Copyright © 2015, Public Library of Science)

DOI

10.1371/journal.pone.0142395

PMID

26544961

Abstract

To translate, validate and examine the reliability and validity of a Chinese version of the Hendrich II Fall risk Model (HFRM) in predicting falls in elderly inpatient. A sample of 989 Chinese elderly inpatients was recruited upon admission at the Peking Union Medical College Hospital. The inpatients were assessed for fall risk using the Chinese version of the HFRM at admission. The reliability of the Chinese version of the HFRM was determined using the internal consistency and test-rested methods. Validity was determined using construct validity and convergent validity. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves were created to determine the sensitivity and specificity. The Chinese version of the HFRM showed excellent repeatability with an intra-class correlation coefficient (ICC) of 0.9950 (95% confidence interval (CI): 0.9923-0.9984). The inter-rater reliability was high with an ICC of 0.9950 (95%CI: 0.9923-0.9984). Cronbach's alpha coefficient was 0.366. Content validity was excellent, with a content validity ratio of 0.9333. The Chinese version of the HFRM had a sensitivity of 72% and a specificity of 69% when using a cut-off of 5 points on the scale. The area under the curve (AUC) was 0.815 (P<0.001). The Chinese version of the HFRM showed good reliability and validity in assessing the risk of fall in Chinese elderly inpatients.

Language: en