SAFETYLIT WEEKLY UPDATE

We compile citations and summaries of about 400 new articles every week.
RSS Feed

HELP: Tutorials | FAQ
CONTACT US: Contact info

Search Results

Journal Article

Citation

Burnett DMR, Noblin CD, Prosser V. Crim. Justice Behav. 2004; 31(4): 438-462.

Copyright

(Copyright © 2004, SAGE Publishing)

DOI

10.1177/0093854804265175

PMID

unavailable

Abstract

Differences in adjudicative competency among juveniles who were either awaiting adjudication (n= 70) or members of an age-matched control group (n= 40) were assessed, and their scores were compared with those of an adult sample. Competency was assessed using the MacArthur Competence Assessment Tool-Criminal Adjudication, which contains three scales: Understanding, Reasoning, and Appreciation. Participants in the comparison group did not complete the Appreciation scale and were compared only on the Reasoning and Understanding scales. The scores earned by participants awaiting adjudication were significantly lower than those earned by comparison participants on the Reasoning scale (p<.05). Scores on the Reasoning and Appreciation scales were found to be related to age. When compared with adults, significant adjudicative deficits were noted among adolescents groups.

Keywords: Juvenile justice


Language: en

NEW SEARCH


All SafetyLit records are available for automatic download to Zotero & Mendeley
Print