Citation

McMahon S, Peterson NA, Winter SC, Palmer JE, Postmus JL, Koenick RA. Am. J. Community Psychol. 2015; 56(1-2): 46-56.

Affiliation

Center on Violence Against Women and Children, School of Social Work, Rutgers University, New Brunswick, NJ, USA, smcmahon@ssw.rutgers.edu.

Copyright

(Copyright © 2015, John Wiley and Sons)

DOI

10.1007/s10464-015-9740-0

PMID

26194588

Abstract

Bystander intervention has been increasingly applied to prevent sexual violence on college campuses. Its underlying theory assumes unidirectional relationships between variables, predicting that bystander behaviors (i.e., actions taken to intervene in sexual violence situations) will be influenced by bystander intentions (BI; i.e., likelihood to intervene in the future), which in turn will be affected by bystander efficacy (BE; i.e., confidence to intervene). One question for theory is whether a reciprocal relationship exists between BI and BE. We used structural equation modeling (SEM) with longitudinal data to test unidirectional and reciprocal causal relations between BI and BE. Participants (n = 1390) were students at a northeastern US university. Four models were examined using SEM: (1) a baseline model with autoregressive paths; (2) a model with autoregressive effects and BI predicting future BE; (3) a model with autoregressive effects and BE predicting future BI; and, (4) a fully cross-lagged model.

RESULTS indicated that reciprocal causality was found to occur between BI and BE. In addition, a final model demonstrated indirect effects of a bystander intervention program on bystander behaviors through both BI and BE at different time points. Implications for theory and practice are described, and directions for future research discussed.

Language: en