Citation

de Keijser JW, van der Leeden R, Jackson JL. Behav. Sci. Law 2002; 20(4): 317-335.

Copyright

(Copyright © 2002, John Wiley and Sons)

DOI

10.1002/bsl.494

PMID

unavailable

Abstract

From a moral standpoint, we would expect the practice of punishment to reflect a solid and commonly shared legitimizing framework. Several moral legal theories explicitly aim to provide such frameworks. Based on the theories of Retributivism, Utilitarianism, and Restorative Justice, this article first sets out to develop a theoretically integrated model of penal attitudes and then explores the extent to which Dutch judges' attitudes to punishment fit the model.

RESULTS indicate that penal attitudes can be measured in a meaningful way that is consistent with an integrated approach to moral theory. The general structure of penal attitudes among Dutch judges suggests a streamlined and pragmatic approach to legal punishment that is identifiably founded on the separate concepts central to moral theories of punishment. While Restorative Justice is frequently presented as an alternative paradigm, results show it to be smoothly incorporated within the streamlined approach. Copyright © 2002 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Language: en