Citation

Metze RN, Kwekkeboom RH, Abma TA. J. Aging Stud. 2015; 34: 57-67.

Affiliation

Dept. Medical Humanities, VU University Medical Centre and EMGO+ Research Institute, De Boelelaan 1117, 1081 HV Amsterdam, The Netherlands. Electronic address: t.abma@vumc.nl.

Copyright

(Copyright © 2015, Elsevier Publishing)

DOI

10.1016/j.jaging.2015.04.003

PMID

26162726

Abstract

AIM: Family Group Conferencing (FGC), a model in which a person and his or her social network make their own 'care' plan, is used in youth care and might also be useful in elderly care to support older persons living at home. In Amsterdam, the Netherlands, FGC was implemented for older adults but they showed resistance. Reasons for this resistance have been researched and are described in this article. We examine existing views and attitudes of older adults concerning the use of FGC, and report on how older adults see the possibility to regain control over their lives using FGC.

METHOD: To do this, focus group sessions, duo interviews and individual interviews were held with older adults with varying characteristics: living at home, in sheltered housing, or in a home for the elderly; and living in urban, suburban or rural areas. Themes were: views on and contentment with the control and autonomy that they experience in their lives, and the willingness to use FGC to improve this.

RESULTS: The main reasons for our respondents to resist FGC were: expecting people to be there for them without a FGC, not feeling ready yet for a FGC, feeling embarrassed when asking for help, being reluctant to open up about their problems, and having the fear of losing control when organizing a FGC. We conclude that, for this generation of older adults, FGC means losing control and autonomy rather than gaining it. To be appealing to older adults, a relational empowerment strengthening model should most likely be focused on reciprocity, peer-to-peer support, and solutions instead of problems.

Language: en