Citation

Rogers R, Bagby RM. Behav. Sci. Law 1992; 10(3): 407-418.

Copyright

(Copyright © 1992, John Wiley and Sons)

DOI

10.1002/bsl.2370100310

PMID

unavailable

Abstract

Consultations to the courts often extend beyond criminal competencies and may include implicit statements regarding the diversion of mentally disordered offenders to treatment facilities. Arguments for diversion are based on humanitarian interests and treatment needs. Arguments opposing diversion recommendations emphasize (a) the variability of opinions regarding treatability, (b) the lack of sufficient outcome data, and (c) the potential for negative consequences in offering unsolicited opinions on diversion. Initial data from 271 pretrial evaluations underscore the range in psychiatric use of diversion recommendations, although inpatient referrals in particular appear to be based on clinical status.

Language: en