Citation

Cutler BL, Dexter HR, Penrod SD. Behav. Sci. Law 1989; 7(2): 215-225.

Copyright

(Copyright © 1989, John Wiley and Sons)

DOI

10.1002/bsl.2370070206

PMID

unavailable

Abstract

This experiment examines the influence of expert psychological testimony on juror decision making in eyewitness identification cases. Experienced jurors and undergraduate mock jurors viewed versions of a videotaped trial, rated the credibility of the eyewitness and the strength of the prosecution's and defense's cases, and rendered verdicts. In the absence of expert testimony jurors were insensitive to eyewitness evidence. Expert testimony improved juror sensitivity to eyewitness evidence without making them more skeptical about the accuracy of the eyewitness identification. Few differences emerged between the experienced jurors and undergraduate mock jurors.

Language: en