SAFETYLIT WEEKLY UPDATE

We compile citations and summaries of about 400 new articles every week.
RSS Feed

HELP: Tutorials | FAQ
CONTACT US: Contact info

Search Results

Journal Article

Citation

Piel J, Finkle MJ, Giske M, Leong GB. J. Am. Acad. Psychiatry Law 2015; 43(2): 201-209.

Affiliation

Dr. Piel is Staff Psychiatrist, VA Puget Sound Health Care System, and Acting Assistant Professor, University of Washington, Seattle, WA. Judge Finkle presides in the King County District Court, King County, WA, and is an Adjunct Professor of Law at Seattle University School of Law, Seattle, WA. Ms. Giske is a Staff Attorney with the Northwest Defenders Division of the King County Department of Public Defense, Seattle, WA. Dr. Leong is a Clinical Professor, Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA.

Copyright

(Copyright © 2015, American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law, Publisher American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law)

DOI

unavailable

PMID

26071510

Abstract

When a criminal defendant flees from one state (often referred to as the requesting state) to another (often referred to as the asylum state), the requesting state can demand that the asylum state return the defendant through a process called extradition. Only a handful of states have considered a fugitive's right to be competent to proceed with an extradition hearing. Those states fall into three categories. Some states apply the same standard as in criminal trial competency cases. Others apply a more limited competency standard. Two have found that a fugitive has no right to be competent to proceed in an extradition hearing. The particular legal test adopted affects the nature and scope of the competency evaluation conducted by the psychiatrist or psychologist in the extradition hearing. In addition, we are not aware of any state that has considered what happens to the fugitive if he is ultimately found not competent to proceed. Legislation, either state by state or through amendments to the Uniform Criminal Extradition Act, can provide the legal and psychiatric communities with guidance in assessing competency initially and in taking appropriate steps if the fugitive is ultimately found not competent.


Language: en

NEW SEARCH


All SafetyLit records are available for automatic download to Zotero & Mendeley
Print