Citation

Clubb AC, Hinkle JC. Crim. Justice Stud. Crit. J. Crime Law Soc. 2015; 28(3): 336-355.

Copyright

(Copyright © 2015, Informa - Taylor and Francis Group)

DOI

10.1080/1478601X.2015.1050590

PMID

unavailable

Abstract

The use of defensive measures can be a double-edged sword: it can provide the means to protect people and property from potential criminal victimization, but can also be a costly and possibly unnecessary endeavor. However, research examining the factors contributing to the decision whether or not to engage in protective measures is often limited in both quantity and scope. In this article, we propose a theoretical framework for understanding the use of protective measures in response to criminal victimization threats based on Ronald Rogers' protection motivation theory. Our discussion details Rogers' theory, suggests variables and measures appropriate for the context of criminal victimization and protective responses, and provides guidance on testing and model adaptation issues. We hope that this will encourage further model development and testing to improve the understanding of individual protective behavior in response to crime or the threat of crime.

Language: en