Citation

Forsyth CJ. Crim. Justice Stud. Crit. J. Crime Law Soc. 2015; 28(2): 161-169.

Copyright

(Copyright © 2015, Informa - Taylor and Francis Group)

DOI

10.1080/1478601X.2014.950842

PMID

unavailable

Abstract

This paper examines Louisiana's habitual offender statute and the role of a sociologist as a mitigation expert/criminologist in a specific case. The paper includes a summary of the habitual offender statute; the literature/theories used by the sociologist in his testimony; the trial judge's decision; and the decision of the three-judge panel of the appellant court, particularly the minority opinion. The case has been returned to the district court for re-sentencing and the trial judge is under no obligation to accept the panel's decision; but in practice must justify any lenient sentence. The use of sociology as mitigation in criminal cases generally is discussed. The author has worked in over 300 criminal cases since 1988, most of which were capital murder, but also include second-degree murder, manslaughter, armed robbery, rape, and habitual offender hearings.

Language: en